Custom eLearning development
We turn your expertise into custom eLearning that helps people build a skill and use it afterwards. Tailored to your goals, and built with the authoring tool the project needs.
A 30-minute call. You leave with a scope and a number, whether or not you hire us.
Delivered to standard, tested on your LMS
1,100+
Courses delivered
250+
Satisfied clients
35+
Languages localized
Based on internal project records.
What we build
Most projects use two or three of these together. If a cheaper tool does the job, we will tell you before you sign.
Why teams pick us
Not values — commitments. Each one is checkable during the project.
Every project opens by writing down what people should be able to do afterwards. Completion rates are a health check, not the point.
You see one real module running on your own LMS before we build the rest. Look, feel and tracking get approved while changes are still cheap.
WCAG 2.2 AA is quoted as its own line, and planned at design stage rather than retrofitted. Keyboard paths, screen-reader semantics and contrast are decided on paper.
Launch, completion, scoring, bookmarking and suspend-data limits verified on the platform and version your learners use, with a written report.
Project files and documentation transfer at close. Keep us on to maintain the course, take it in-house, or take it elsewhere — nothing is held back as leverage.
Clean variable naming, documented triggers and modular structure, so an update in two years does not mean rebuilding — whether we make it or your team does.
How we work
How long each phase takes depends on the scope. If you already have storyboards and only need the build, we start at Prove it early.
We agree what people should be able to do once the course is over, and how you will know. Everything after this is judged against that sentence.
Your subject-matter experts see a storyboard before anything is built. Structure, scenarios, assessment logic and — when the brief needs it — accessibility decisions are all settled on paper, where changes are cheap.
We build one real module — fully styled, fully interactive, running on your LMS. You approve the look and the tracking before we scale it across the rest of the course. If you already have storyboards, this is where we start.
Production runs against the approved prototype. You see builds as they land rather than waiting for a single reveal at the end, so course corrections stay small.
Functional and tracking testing on the platform your learners actually use, plus accessibility testing when it is in the quote. You get the test matrix showing what was checked, on what, and the result.
We hand over source files. If you want us to stay, we can watch the first cohort with you and use that to scope the next release — or your team can take it from there.
Sectors we know
Training problems are sector-specific. These are the environments we have built for often enough to know the constraints before you explain them.
Clinical staff train between shifts, on shared devices, under regulators who expect evidence of competence rather than attendance.
Regulatory change lands faster than courses can be rebuilt, and every completion has to stand up to an audit years later.
Frontline teams are on the floor, not at desks, and the cost of getting a procedure wrong is measured in injuries and downtime.
High turnover means you are onboarding continuously, and seasonal peaks arrive before new starters are confident.
Procurement demands accessibility evidence up front, and courses must work on locked-down hardware and older browsers.
The product ships every two weeks, which means training is out of date roughly as fast as you can publish it.
Faculty content is rich but rarely built for self-paced online study, and accessibility obligations are non-negotiable.
Mandatory training is the least-liked hour of the year, and click-through completion proves nothing if behaviour does not change.
Selected work
Client names are withheld where the engagement is under NDA. The constraints and the approach are the useful part anyway.
What clients say
We can tell you how we work. Our clients can tell you what it’s actually like — from the first conversation and the rounds of feedback to the course that brings it all together.
I had the great privilege of working with Oleh at Theory of Enchantment for two years. He and his team transformed Enchantment's existing course into a beautiful, slick version for our bigger clients. This was especially necessary as we ultimately couldn't find an LMS platform to fit our needs and yet the scorm files were so good they could stand alone. Oleh was able to have images slide in and create other beautiful, emotionally compelling visuals that increasingly made the Enchantment course feel playful and fun, which is what I was aiming for. This made our clients more eager to finish the course and led to greater retention of the material. Oleh was very responsive whenever we requested edits, getting them done in a 24 hour turn-around time. I highly recommend working with him if you're designing a course and looking to work with the very best.
Chloe SimoneFounder, Theory of EnchantmentI had the absolute pleasure of working with Oleh on a large-scale eLearning project that involved developing a huge number of Articulate Storyline courses — and what he and the team he managed delivered was nothing short of exceptional. What made their achievement even more impressive was that the courses were not in their native language. Despite this, Oleh led the team with remarkable skill, precision, and professionalism. He not only demonstrated deep technical expertise, but also an outstanding ability to manage complexity, adapt quickly, and deliver engaging, high-quality learning experiences under challenging conditions. Oleh is a true leader and a dedicated professional — detail-oriented, committed, and always willing to go above and beyond. If you're looking for someone who can lead teams and deliver top-tier results under pressure, I wholeheartedly recommend Oleh.
Rasha Al OmariTechnology Director, AlwasaetYaroslav's work on our e-learning course modules has been nothing short of exceptional! He displayed a high level of proficiency, demonstrating his comprehensive understanding of course design and development. His approach to preparing the nine modules was meticulous and well-thought-out, ensuring that the final product was both engaging and instructive. His dedication to the project was evident in his consistent availability and swift responses to any queries or adjustments. He maintained a professional demeanour throughout the project, coupled with a strong work ethic and a commitment to meeting deadlines. What sets Yaroslav apart is his ability to seamlessly incorporate feedback and make necessary adjustments promptly. His attention to detail and quality is truly commendable! I HIGHLY recommend Yaroslav to anyone in need of a reliable and skilled freelancer for e-learning course development.
Osama SiddiqueCo-CEO, Kruzee
See it three ways
The same course — Blockchain Technology — built three times over, in Storyline, Rise and Synthesia. These are the real published builds, not screenshots: play them, then read what each one costs you in the column beside it.
Published output / playable
The real module, running here exactly as it would on your LMS.
Open it full size(opens in a new tab)Decisions that carry consequences — where someone needs to get it wrong somewhere safe.
The trade-off. The most expensive of the three to build, and the slowest to change once it is live.
Timings are for this course at this size. Yours will move with scope, and we would rather work that out on a call than have you guess from a table.
Tools and standards
Authoring tool choice follows the project, not our preference. Standards conformance is not negotiable either way.
Before you ask
If yours is not here, ask it on the call — we would rather answer it than have you guess.
Scope and complexity drive the timeline far more than length does. A straightforward module built from approved content can be designed, developed and ready to launch inside a week; one carrying heavy interactivity, custom animation, media or bespoke functionality runs to several weeks. Larger programmes run in parallel tracks rather than sequentially, so a five-module curriculum does not take five times as long, and conversions of existing material are faster than building new.
Cost tracks interactivity, not page count. A Rise course built from approved content sits at the low end; a Storyline branching simulation with custom media and localization sits at the high end. We quote per module against an agreed storyboard so the number does not move unless the scope does.
We test on your LMS before delivery rather than assuming standards compliance is enough. That covers launch, completion, scoring, bookmarking and suspend-data limits, on the version you actually run. You receive a written test report with the package showing what was verified.
Yes. Storyline, Rise, Captivate and design source files are handed over at project close along with documentation of variables, triggers and structure. We can stay on to maintain the course, or you can take it in-house or to another vendor. We do not hold source files as leverage.
Yes, when that is useful. We stay on for updates, translations and the next release. The files are yours either way, so you can also take maintenance in-house — that is a choice, not a requirement.
That is the normal arrangement. SME time is the most common cause of delay on eLearning projects, so we schedule specific review windows up front, send material ahead of them, and consolidate feedback into a single pass rather than collecting comments indefinitely.
Extra, and deliberately so. Plenty of courses go to a known internal audience with no accessibility requirement, and we would rather not build that cost into every quote for work most projects do not need. When you do need it, we build to WCAG 2.2 AA — keyboard navigation, screen-reader semantics, captions, contrast and focus order — scoped at storyboard stage, which is the only point where it is inexpensive. Section 508 documentation and a VPAT are available on request. Tell us on the first call and it goes into the quote as its own line.
Yes. A meaningful share of our work is delivered under partner agencies' branding, with their client relationship left intact. We can work inside your project management process, attend client calls as your team, or stay entirely behind the scenes — whichever the engagement calls for.
For first-draft scripting, image generation and knowledge-check drafting, always with an instructional designer reviewing before anything reaches a learner. We disclose where AI was used in a build. We do not train models on your content, and confidential material stays out of third-party tools unless you have approved that in writing.
Start here
Thirty minutes, no deck. Bring the problem and any material you already have. You leave with an approach, a realistic timeline and a number — whether or not you work with us.
Prefer email? eperfection.learning@gmail.com
